<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1000 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax against an appellant providing security services, despite discrepancies in income figures and the inclusion of charges for drivers, cleaning, and gardening. The appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within eight weeks, with a stay on recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency. A waiver on the predeposit of the balance dues was granted considering the appellant&#039;s financial difficulties, aiming to ensure a fair resolution of the service tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:00:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1000 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax against an appellant providing security services, despite discrepancies in income figures and the inclusion of charges for drivers, cleaning, and gardening. The appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within eight weeks, with a stay on recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency. A waiver on the predeposit of the balance dues was granted considering the appellant&#039;s financial difficulties, aiming to ensure a fair resolution of the service tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>