<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 994 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255795</link>
    <description>An appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act is not maintainable against a Tribunal order recorded on consent of parties. Section 35G(9) applies the Code of Civil Procedure to such appeals so far as may be, and Section 96(3) of the CPC bars an appeal from a consent decree. As the Tribunal&#039;s order was a consent order, the appellate challenge was held to be barred and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:59:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 994 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255795</link>
      <description>An appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act is not maintainable against a Tribunal order recorded on consent of parties. Section 35G(9) applies the Code of Civil Procedure to such appeals so far as may be, and Section 96(3) of the CPC bars an appeal from a consent decree. As the Tribunal&#039;s order was a consent order, the appellate challenge was held to be barred and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>