<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 993 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255794</link>
    <description>Toned milk sold in tetra packs, pasteurised and subjected to ultra high temperature treatment without additives, was treated as exempt milk under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act because the exemption entry covered fresh milk, pasteurised milk and directly reconstituted milk, and did not distinguish UHT processing from pasteurisation. The Court also noted that the Tribunal wrongly relied on the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 when assessing liability under the 1959 Act. In the absence of any separate entry for UHT milk or evidence that the product was flavoured milk, the assessee was entitled to exemption, and the penalty under section 12(3)(b) could not survive once the assessment failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:58:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 993 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255794</link>
      <description>Toned milk sold in tetra packs, pasteurised and subjected to ultra high temperature treatment without additives, was treated as exempt milk under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act because the exemption entry covered fresh milk, pasteurised milk and directly reconstituted milk, and did not distinguish UHT processing from pasteurisation. The Court also noted that the Tribunal wrongly relied on the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 when assessing liability under the 1959 Act. In the absence of any separate entry for UHT milk or evidence that the product was flavoured milk, the assessee was entitled to exemption, and the penalty under section 12(3)(b) could not survive once the assessment failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>