https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255792 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, allowing CENVAT credit on services like transit insurance and staff insurance. The Tribunal considered these services as valid input services, overturning the Order-in-Original that imposed penalties for alleged wrongful credit availed under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of settled rulings supporting the appellant's claim on similar input services and the connection of services to manufacturing activities for availing CENVAT credit. The appellant was granted consequential relief without a decision on the limitation issue. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:58:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255792 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, allowing CENVAT credit on services like transit insurance and staff insurance. The Tribunal considered these services as valid input services, overturning the Order-in-Original that imposed penalties for alleged wrongful credit availed under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of settled rulings supporting the appellant's claim on similar input services and the connection of services to manufacturing activities for availing CENVAT credit. The appellant was granted consequential relief without a decision on the limitation issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255792