<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 975 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255776</link>
    <description>Interference with an acquittal in leave to appeal proceedings is warranted only for very substantial and compelling reasons, such as a plainly wrong factual finding, misreading of material evidence, or grave illegality; where the trial court has taken a reasonable view, the acquittal should stand. The commentary also notes that criminal proceedings for offences punishable with up to six months&#039; imprisonment are subject to a one-year limitation for cognizance, and that this statutory bar is mandatory. On the stated facts, the acquittal was not disturbed and the prosecution was treated as barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 975 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255776</link>
      <description>Interference with an acquittal in leave to appeal proceedings is warranted only for very substantial and compelling reasons, such as a plainly wrong factual finding, misreading of material evidence, or grave illegality; where the trial court has taken a reasonable view, the acquittal should stand. The commentary also notes that criminal proceedings for offences punishable with up to six months&#039; imprisonment are subject to a one-year limitation for cognizance, and that this statutory bar is mandatory. On the stated facts, the acquittal was not disturbed and the prosecution was treated as barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>