<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 960 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing all appeals by the Revenue and the Assessee. The additions related to unexplained unsecured loans, share capital, and interest disallowance were deleted, and the treatment of ROC fees as capital expenditure was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 960 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing all appeals by the Revenue and the Assessee. The additions related to unexplained unsecured loans, share capital, and interest disallowance were deleted, and the treatment of ROC fees as capital expenditure was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>