<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255740</link>
    <description>Vitamin premix and mineral premix made from processed starch with added vitamins and minerals were treated as starch-based preparations rather than separate chemically defined compounds. Chapter Heading 2936 did not apply because it covers provitamins, vitamins and intermixtures used primarily as vitamins, and Chapter Heading 2851 did not apply because the mineral premix was only a homogeneous mixture, not a separate chemically defined compound. Chapter Heading 1901 was found to be the more specific tariff entry, supported by the HSN notes, so the goods were classifiable as preparations of starch and attracted nil rate of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255740</link>
      <description>Vitamin premix and mineral premix made from processed starch with added vitamins and minerals were treated as starch-based preparations rather than separate chemically defined compounds. Chapter Heading 2936 did not apply because it covers provitamins, vitamins and intermixtures used primarily as vitamins, and Chapter Heading 2851 did not apply because the mineral premix was only a homogeneous mixture, not a separate chemically defined compound. Chapter Heading 1901 was found to be the more specific tariff entry, supported by the HSN notes, so the goods were classifiable as preparations of starch and attracted nil rate of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>