<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 936 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting a full refund of ad hoc deposits made under protest, as there was no outstanding duty demand against the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the full refund claim based on dropped duty liability demands and subsequent events. The Tribunal&#039;s decision concluded the case, emphasizing the validity of the refund and dismissing challenges to restrict the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:07:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 936 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting a full refund of ad hoc deposits made under protest, as there was no outstanding duty demand against the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the full refund claim based on dropped duty liability demands and subsequent events. The Tribunal&#039;s decision concluded the case, emphasizing the validity of the refund and dismissing challenges to restrict the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>