<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 916 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the entire rental income should be assessed in the hands of the assessee as per the Income Tax Act provisions, rejecting division based on the MOU or Muslim Personal Law. The Tribunal emphasized that personal law principles do not supersede the Income Tax Act in determining fiscal liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 10:17:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 916 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the entire rental income should be assessed in the hands of the assessee as per the Income Tax Act provisions, rejecting division based on the MOU or Muslim Personal Law. The Tribunal emphasized that personal law principles do not supersede the Income Tax Act in determining fiscal liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>