<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 153 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168166</link>
    <description>The HC noted that where purchase tax on empty bottles and packing material was not leviable, sales tax could still be directed on their sale within the limits of the original assessment, and the quantified levy was upheld. It further held that export duty on spirit exported to other States or Union Territories remained part of the dealer&#039;s taxable turnover because the duty was a primary burden on the manufacturer, even if collected through another person. It also ruled that taxing authorities lack jurisdiction to decide the vires of a notification, so the enhanced purchase tax notification had to be treated as operative for assessment purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:59:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 153 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168166</link>
      <description>The HC noted that where purchase tax on empty bottles and packing material was not leviable, sales tax could still be directed on their sale within the limits of the original assessment, and the quantified levy was upheld. It further held that export duty on spirit exported to other States or Union Territories remained part of the dealer&#039;s taxable turnover because the duty was a primary burden on the manufacturer, even if collected through another person. It also ruled that taxing authorities lack jurisdiction to decide the vires of a notification, so the enhanced purchase tax notification had to be treated as operative for assessment purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>