<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 911 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168165</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitioner&#039;s writ, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the assessing officer to recalculate the tax in accordance with the notification dated January 30, 1993. The petitioner was entitled to the concessional tax rate of 4% without the need to submit forms C or D for sales under sub-section (2) of Section 8.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:59:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 911 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168165</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitioner&#039;s writ, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the assessing officer to recalculate the tax in accordance with the notification dated January 30, 1993. The petitioner was entitled to the concessional tax rate of 4% without the need to submit forms C or D for sales under sub-section (2) of Section 8.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>