<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 773 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168158</link>
    <description>Liability under a surety bond for tax exemption is confined to the period expressly covered by that bond. Recovery proceedings against the surety may be sustained only for defaults, if any, arising within the bonded period, and cannot be extended to later periods for which separate bonds were required. On that basis, recovery action against the surety was set aside to the extent it sought recovery beyond the covered period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:59:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 773 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168158</link>
      <description>Liability under a surety bond for tax exemption is confined to the period expressly covered by that bond. Recovery proceedings against the surety may be sustained only for defaults, if any, arising within the bonded period, and cannot be extended to later periods for which separate bonds were required. On that basis, recovery action against the surety was set aside to the extent it sought recovery beyond the covered period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>