https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168148 Title to property directly and substantially determined in land acquisition proceedings operates as res judicata in later litigation between the same parties or those claiming under them, including mortgagees who actively defended the mortgagor's title. The earlier decision was held to conclusively bar re-agitation of Rajlakshmi's title to the four anna share. The subsequent suit was also held not barred by section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure or by limitation, because it rested on a fresh cause of action arising after compromise and partition. Rajlakshmi's title and right to possession were declared, and the mortgagees' derivative claim failed. en-us Mon, 27 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:49:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168148 Title to property directly and substantially determined in land acquisition proceedings operates as res judicata in later litigation between the same parties or those claiming under them, including mortgagees who actively defended the mortgagor's title. The earlier decision was held to conclusively bar re-agitation of Rajlakshmi's title to the four anna share. The subsequent suit was also held not barred by section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure or by limitation, because it rested on a fresh cause of action arising after compromise and partition. Rajlakshmi's title and right to possession were declared, and the mortgagees' derivative claim failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168148