<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 892 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255693</link>
    <description>An appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was held not entertainable where the grievance was that the Tribunal had omitted to consider certain grounds. The proper course in such a situation is to seek examination of those omitted grounds before the same court or tribunal, rather than invoke the High Court in the first instance. The High Court therefore declined to entertain the appeals and dismissed them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 892 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255693</link>
      <description>An appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was held not entertainable where the grievance was that the Tribunal had omitted to consider certain grounds. The proper course in such a situation is to seek examination of those omitted grounds before the same court or tribunal, rather than invoke the High Court in the first instance. The High Court therefore declined to entertain the appeals and dismissed them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>