<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 888 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255689</link>
    <description>Rule 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed to apply to companies as juristic persons, on the basis that &quot;any person&quot; includes corporate entities and that penal consequences may attach even where imprisonment cannot. The provision was also given wide reach to cover indirect dealing with excisable goods: supplying scrap without documents to facilitate another entity&#039;s manufacture and clandestine clearance amounted to conduct falling within &quot;in any other manner deals with&quot; goods liable to confiscation. On that reasoning, the penalty was sustained and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 888 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255689</link>
      <description>Rule 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed to apply to companies as juristic persons, on the basis that &quot;any person&quot; includes corporate entities and that penal consequences may attach even where imprisonment cannot. The provision was also given wide reach to cover indirect dealing with excisable goods: supplying scrap without documents to facilitate another entity&#039;s manufacture and clandestine clearance amounted to conduct falling within &quot;in any other manner deals with&quot; goods liable to confiscation. On that reasoning, the penalty was sustained and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>