<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 884 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255685</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that included royalty/licence fee in the assessable value of imported goods. It was determined that the royalty payment was based on value addition in India, not on imported raw materials&#039; value, and was unrelated to import prices. The collaboration agreement terms clarified that royalty was for technical know-how and consultancy services, distinct from imported goods. Precedents like ABB Ltd. Vs. CC (Import), Mumbai, and Foseco India Ltd. case were relied upon to support the decision to exclude royalty from the assessable value, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance and consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 884 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255685</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that included royalty/licence fee in the assessable value of imported goods. It was determined that the royalty payment was based on value addition in India, not on imported raw materials&#039; value, and was unrelated to import prices. The collaboration agreement terms clarified that royalty was for technical know-how and consultancy services, distinct from imported goods. Precedents like ABB Ltd. Vs. CC (Import), Mumbai, and Foseco India Ltd. case were relied upon to support the decision to exclude royalty from the assessable value, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance and consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>