https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255684 A criminal complaint under FERA was quashed where the allegations were materially altered after the show-cause stage, with consent and connivance later deleted but reintroduced in the complaint, while the appellant's reply and other supporting material were omitted. The absence of original documents and the suppression of relevant facts vitiated the foundation for cognizance. Although negligence could in principle be examined separately, the prosecution was held not sustainable on the facts disclosed, and the complaint proceedings were set aside. en-us Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Aug 2015 18:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255684 A criminal complaint under FERA was quashed where the allegations were materially altered after the show-cause stage, with consent and connivance later deleted but reintroduced in the complaint, while the appellant's reply and other supporting material were omitted. The absence of original documents and the suppression of relevant facts vitiated the foundation for cognizance. Although negligence could in principle be examined separately, the prosecution was held not sustainable on the facts disclosed, and the complaint proceedings were set aside. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255684