<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 865 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-Tax&#039;s order under section 263, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s non-compliance with section 144C rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal also affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal of the appeal as infructuous since the assessment was set aside for re-framing. Both appeals by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 865 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-Tax&#039;s order under section 263, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s non-compliance with section 144C rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal also affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal of the appeal as infructuous since the assessment was set aside for re-framing. Both appeals by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>