<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 863 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255664</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of an addition on account of low yield of finished products was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence to support the addition and noting that the assessee&#039;s records were audited with no deficiencies found. Additionally, the disallowance of additional depreciation on plant and machinery was upheld, as the expenses were for maintenance, not acquisition of new machinery as required by law. Both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed, affirming the decisions of the CIT(A) on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 863 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255664</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of an addition on account of low yield of finished products was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence to support the addition and noting that the assessee&#039;s records were audited with no deficiencies found. Additionally, the disallowance of additional depreciation on plant and machinery was upheld, as the expenses were for maintenance, not acquisition of new machinery as required by law. Both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed, affirming the decisions of the CIT(A) on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>