<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 861 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255662</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order for a pre-deposit of Rs. 10,00,000 on the appellant, a service provider, in a service tax dispute related to transportation charges. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of not being liable for the tax, the Court affirmed the decision based on the recipient of service being responsible for the tax liability, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:18:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 861 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255662</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order for a pre-deposit of Rs. 10,00,000 on the appellant, a service provider, in a service tax dispute related to transportation charges. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of not being liable for the tax, the Court affirmed the decision based on the recipient of service being responsible for the tax liability, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>