<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 850 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255651</link>
    <description>Parts and components supplied for lift installation were classifiable as parts suitable for use with lifting machinery under Heading 84.31, because the consignments did not contain essential elements of a complete lift and therefore lacked the character of finished machinery. The demand for August 1986 to August 1990 was time-barred, since the dispute was one of classification, the department was aware of the facts, and extended limitation could not be invoked without suppression with intent to evade duty. For the provisional period from 1-9-1990 onward, demand required finalisation of provisional assessments and prices, so the matter was remanded for re-quantification. Penalty was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 850 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255651</link>
      <description>Parts and components supplied for lift installation were classifiable as parts suitable for use with lifting machinery under Heading 84.31, because the consignments did not contain essential elements of a complete lift and therefore lacked the character of finished machinery. The demand for August 1986 to August 1990 was time-barred, since the dispute was one of classification, the department was aware of the facts, and extended limitation could not be invoked without suppression with intent to evade duty. For the provisional period from 1-9-1990 onward, demand required finalisation of provisional assessments and prices, so the matter was remanded for re-quantification. Penalty was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>