https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255643 Non-appearance of the appellant on successive hearing dates led the HC to dismiss the central excise matter for want of prosecution. The court noted that the appellant had not appeared when the case was called, including on earlier dates, and therefore declined to proceed further. en-us Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255643 Non-appearance of the appellant on successive hearing dates led the HC to dismiss the central excise matter for want of prosecution. The court noted that the appellant had not appeared when the case was called, including on earlier dates, and therefore declined to proceed further. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255643