https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255642 The appellant's appeal for a refund of duty paid was rejected by the first appellate authority and upheld by the court. The court emphasized that the inclusion of transportation and insurance costs in the assessable value was correct, as previously ruled by CESTAT. The appellant's failure to challenge the earlier CESTAT order rendered the refund claim invalid. The court stressed the importance of challenging adverse decisions through proper legal procedures before seeking refunds, ultimately affirming the decision to reject the appellant's refund claim. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:14:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255642 The appellant's appeal for a refund of duty paid was rejected by the first appellate authority and upheld by the court. The court emphasized that the inclusion of transportation and insurance costs in the assessable value was correct, as previously ruled by CESTAT. The appellant's failure to challenge the earlier CESTAT order rendered the refund claim invalid. The court stressed the importance of challenging adverse decisions through proper legal procedures before seeking refunds, ultimately affirming the decision to reject the appellant's refund claim. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255642