https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168137 Rule 40 of the Army Rules was construed to mean the smaller prescribed unit treated as a "corps" under Rule 187, not the broader "Army Corps"; on that reading, the General Court Martial composition was held to conform to the rule and to promote an unbiased tribunal. For an officer, compliance with Rules 22, 23 and 24 depended on a request under Rule 25, so their non-observance without such a request did not invalidate the convening of the court-martial. Rule 180 was held to operate only when a Court of Inquiry is actually held, and did not create a mandatory pre-trial requirement in every case involving possible injury to reputation. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168137 Rule 40 of the Army Rules was construed to mean the smaller prescribed unit treated as a "corps" under Rule 187, not the broader "Army Corps"; on that reading, the General Court Martial composition was held to conform to the rule and to promote an unbiased tribunal. For an officer, compliance with Rules 22, 23 and 24 depended on a request under Rule 25, so their non-observance without such a request did not invalidate the convening of the court-martial. Rule 180 was held to operate only when a Court of Inquiry is actually held, and did not create a mandatory pre-trial requirement in every case involving possible injury to reputation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168137