<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 817 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255618</link>
    <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was found in a dispute over duty demand linked to clearances under Chapter X procedure and Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. The Tribunal treated the issue as identical to an earlier manufacturer&#039;s case, where relief had been granted on the basis of prior Bench precedent, and concluded that the nature of the dispute justified interim protection pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 817 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255618</link>
      <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was found in a dispute over duty demand linked to clearances under Chapter X procedure and Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. The Tribunal treated the issue as identical to an earlier manufacturer&#039;s case, where relief had been granted on the basis of prior Bench precedent, and concluded that the nature of the dispute justified interim protection pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>