<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 814 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255615</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled that the time limit for filing refund claims in the context of service exports should be reckoned from the date of receipt of consideration, not the date of transmission for electronic data. The Tribunal found the appellants eligible for refund on merits but directed the original adjudicating authority to proceed based on the new interpretation of the time limit. It remanded the matters for a fresh decision ensuring principles of natural justice and compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:38:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 814 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255615</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled that the time limit for filing refund claims in the context of service exports should be reckoned from the date of receipt of consideration, not the date of transmission for electronic data. The Tribunal found the appellants eligible for refund on merits but directed the original adjudicating authority to proceed based on the new interpretation of the time limit. It remanded the matters for a fresh decision ensuring principles of natural justice and compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>