<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 768 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255569</link>
    <description>Service tax on Technical Testing and Analysis Services was examined against Rule 3 of the Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India) Rules, 2006 and its proviso. The applicant argued that the services were tested outside India and claimed total waiver of pre-deposit, but the Revenue noted that the exclusion for sub-clause (zzh) operated only from 1 April 2011, leaving part of the disputed period uncovered. On that prima facie basis, complete waiver was not justified. Total waiver of pre-deposit was declined, and only partial relief was granted subject to deposit of the specified amount, with recovery stayed on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:32:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 768 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255569</link>
      <description>Service tax on Technical Testing and Analysis Services was examined against Rule 3 of the Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India) Rules, 2006 and its proviso. The applicant argued that the services were tested outside India and claimed total waiver of pre-deposit, but the Revenue noted that the exclusion for sub-clause (zzh) operated only from 1 April 2011, leaving part of the disputed period uncovered. On that prima facie basis, complete waiver was not justified. Total waiver of pre-deposit was declined, and only partial relief was granted subject to deposit of the specified amount, with recovery stayed on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>