https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255562 The High Court found the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction under the Excise Act and did not interfere with the finding of guilt. As the challenge on merits was not pressed, the Court confined itself to sentence, and reduced the punishment in view of the age of the case, the appellant's lack of previous criminal history, and the custody already undergone. The conviction was maintained, while the sentence was reduced to the period already undergone and the fine was lowered. en-us Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255562 The High Court found the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction under the Excise Act and did not interfere with the finding of guilt. As the challenge on merits was not pressed, the Court confined itself to sentence, and reduced the punishment in view of the age of the case, the appellant's lack of previous criminal history, and the custody already undergone. The conviction was maintained, while the sentence was reduced to the period already undergone and the fine was lowered. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255562