https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255556 The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law concerning whether the ratio in Indo Rama Synthetics (2007) applied to the facts, whether the Tribunal correctly distinguished the meaning of "input" under the Cenvat Credit Rules from the construction of the exemption notification, and whether demand for allied activities was sustained without proper consideration of the assessee's submissions. The document focuses on the legal scope of Cenvat credit eligibility, interpretation of exemption notifications, and procedural fairness in the Tribunal's handling of the controversy. en-us Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255556 The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law concerning whether the ratio in Indo Rama Synthetics (2007) applied to the facts, whether the Tribunal correctly distinguished the meaning of "input" under the Cenvat Credit Rules from the construction of the exemption notification, and whether demand for allied activities was sustained without proper consideration of the assessee's submissions. The document focuses on the legal scope of Cenvat credit eligibility, interpretation of exemption notifications, and procedural fairness in the Tribunal's handling of the controversy. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255556