<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CIT vs. AO: No Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) for Foreign Commission; Two Views Possible, Not Erroneous.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21477</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - AO chose not to make any disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) on foreign commission received - when two views are possible and the ITO has taken one view with which the CIT does not agree, it cannot be treated as an erroneous order prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:48:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CIT vs. AO: No Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) for Foreign Commission; Two Views Possible, Not Erroneous.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21477</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - AO chose not to make any disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) on foreign commission received - when two views are possible and the ITO has taken one view with which the CIT does not agree, it cannot be treated as an erroneous order prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:48:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>