<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 739 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255540</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the issue to be sent back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various issues, including allowing depreciation on assets, deletion of prior period expenses, and treatment of processing fees as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contentions on commission paid for processing loans and exchange rate fluctuation. The general grounds raised by the Revenue were dismissed without adjudication. The issue regarding provisions made towards routine expenses was remanded to the AO for proper examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:14:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 739 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255540</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the issue to be sent back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various issues, including allowing depreciation on assets, deletion of prior period expenses, and treatment of processing fees as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contentions on commission paid for processing loans and exchange rate fluctuation. The general grounds raised by the Revenue were dismissed without adjudication. The issue regarding provisions made towards routine expenses was remanded to the AO for proper examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>