<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 734 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255535</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty levied on the disallowance made under Section 94(7) of the Income Tax Act was liable to be deleted, directing the Assessing Officer to remove the penalty. As the disallowance of expenses issue was sent back to the AO for re-examination, the penalty on this matter did not stand. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the order was issued on 9th January 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:14:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 734 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255535</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty levied on the disallowance made under Section 94(7) of the Income Tax Act was liable to be deleted, directing the Assessing Officer to remove the penalty. As the disallowance of expenses issue was sent back to the AO for re-examination, the penalty on this matter did not stand. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the order was issued on 9th January 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>