<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 731 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed cross appeals, directing the AO to verify and decide on issues based on guidelines and precedents. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Rule 8D for disallowance computations and upheld the Supreme Court&#039;s stance on the taxability of certain benefits as hypothetical income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:14:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 731 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed cross appeals, directing the AO to verify and decide on issues based on guidelines and precedents. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Rule 8D for disallowance computations and upheld the Supreme Court&#039;s stance on the taxability of certain benefits as hypothetical income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>