<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 728 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, granting a waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax, interest, and penalties amounting to Rs. 2,26,72,415. The applicant successfully argued that their fabrication activity should be considered as manufacturing, exempting them from service tax liability. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the applicant was entitled to Cenvat Credit on capital goods used for both exempted and taxable services, as there were no allegations of suppression. The Tribunal directed a partial pre-deposit, reserving the limitation issue for final hearing, ultimately deciding in favor of the applicant for the waiver.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:34:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 728 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, granting a waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax, interest, and penalties amounting to Rs. 2,26,72,415. The applicant successfully argued that their fabrication activity should be considered as manufacturing, exempting them from service tax liability. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the applicant was entitled to Cenvat Credit on capital goods used for both exempted and taxable services, as there were no allegations of suppression. The Tribunal directed a partial pre-deposit, reserving the limitation issue for final hearing, ultimately deciding in favor of the applicant for the waiver.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>