<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 718 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255519</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the appellate authority to expedite the disposal of the petitioner&#039;s appeal within six months. Emphasizing the importance of maintaining the stay order to protect the petitioner&#039;s interests, the court addressed the delay in appeal disposal, automatic vacation of stay orders, and initiation of recovery proceedings. The judgment aimed to ensure a prompt resolution of the appeal to prevent further recovery actions by the third respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:32:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 718 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255519</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the appellate authority to expedite the disposal of the petitioner&#039;s appeal within six months. Emphasizing the importance of maintaining the stay order to protect the petitioner&#039;s interests, the court addressed the delay in appeal disposal, automatic vacation of stay orders, and initiation of recovery proceedings. The judgment aimed to ensure a prompt resolution of the appeal to prevent further recovery actions by the third respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>