<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 695 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255496</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order, confirming the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 14,99,400. The appeal was dismissed as the assessee failed to provide a bona fide explanation, leading to the conclusion that inaccurate particulars of income were furnished to evade tax. The decision was rendered on 17.9.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 695 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255496</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order, confirming the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 14,99,400. The appeal was dismissed as the assessee failed to provide a bona fide explanation, leading to the conclusion that inaccurate particulars of income were furnished to evade tax. The decision was rendered on 17.9.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>