<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 693 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the AO to delete additions of Rs. 10.50 crores for revenue recognition and Rs. 3.70 crores under Section 68. However, it upheld the disallowance of Rs. 4,63,110 for motor car expenses, interest on car loan, and depreciation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:20:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 693 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the AO to delete additions of Rs. 10.50 crores for revenue recognition and Rs. 3.70 crores under Section 68. However, it upheld the disallowance of Rs. 4,63,110 for motor car expenses, interest on car loan, and depreciation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>