<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 683 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay against recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency, acknowledging a prima facie case for relief in the appellant&#039;s EPC project. The judgment discussed the classification of services under &#039;Works Contract Service,&#039; the extended period for tax demands, interpretation of circulars, and criteria for a complete waiver of pre-deposit. The Tribunal emphasized contractors&#039; role in executing projects and rejected arguments based on the Government&#039;s involvement. The appellant&#039;s lack of bona fide belief regarding tax liability was noted, leading to the grant of relief and stay against recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 683 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay against recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency, acknowledging a prima facie case for relief in the appellant&#039;s EPC project. The judgment discussed the classification of services under &#039;Works Contract Service,&#039; the extended period for tax demands, interpretation of circulars, and criteria for a complete waiver of pre-deposit. The Tribunal emphasized contractors&#039; role in executing projects and rejected arguments based on the Government&#039;s involvement. The appellant&#039;s lack of bona fide belief regarding tax liability was noted, leading to the grant of relief and stay against recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>