https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255475 Where the assessee had already made a substantial pre-deposit and the Tribunal dispensed with the remaining pre-deposit while staying recovery of the balance demand, an attachment issued merely as an aid to recovery could not be sustained. The High Court held that such attachment could not continue once recovery of the balance duty was stayed, and the impugned attachment order was liable to be lifted. The writ petition succeeded and the attachment was set aside. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:11:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255475 Where the assessee had already made a substantial pre-deposit and the Tribunal dispensed with the remaining pre-deposit while staying recovery of the balance demand, an attachment issued merely as an aid to recovery could not be sustained. The High Court held that such attachment could not continue once recovery of the balance duty was stayed, and the impugned attachment order was liable to be lifted. The writ petition succeeded and the attachment was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255475