<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 672 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the imported goods were correctly warehoused under section 49 of the Customs Act, not section 59. The mis-declaration allegations were dropped, and the goods were held pending proceedings under section 49, leading to the request for conversion of the warehousing bill of entry into a home consumption bill of entry. The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s argument, emphasizing that the case fell under section 49, ultimately allowing the appeal based on this interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:49:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 672 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the imported goods were correctly warehoused under section 49 of the Customs Act, not section 59. The mis-declaration allegations were dropped, and the goods were held pending proceedings under section 49, leading to the request for conversion of the warehousing bill of entry into a home consumption bill of entry. The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s argument, emphasizing that the case fell under section 49, ultimately allowing the appeal based on this interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>