<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 668 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on a shipping agent under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 for contravening Facility Notice No. 69/2011. The Tribunal found the show cause notice vague and lacking essential details, deeming it defective. As a result, the impugned order imposing the penalty was overturned, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, potentially entitling them to consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 668 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on a shipping agent under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 for contravening Facility Notice No. 69/2011. The Tribunal found the show cause notice vague and lacking essential details, deeming it defective. As a result, the impugned order imposing the penalty was overturned, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, potentially entitling them to consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>