<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 658 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for all three assessment years, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 153A and for undisclosed investments in flats. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of incriminating material for revisiting concluded assessments and the need for corroborating evidence when relying on sworn statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 658 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for all three assessment years, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 153A and for undisclosed investments in flats. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of incriminating material for revisiting concluded assessments and the need for corroborating evidence when relying on sworn statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>