<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 649 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The income from the sale of plots at Kondhwa was correctly assessed as &#039;capital gains&#039; rather than &#039;business income&#039;. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs. 31,27,500/- related to an advance from M/s. Mantri Construction, as the transaction did not constitute a &#039;transfer&#039; under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 31st December 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:53:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 649 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The income from the sale of plots at Kondhwa was correctly assessed as &#039;capital gains&#039; rather than &#039;business income&#039;. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs. 31,27,500/- related to an advance from M/s. Mantri Construction, as the transaction did not constitute a &#039;transfer&#039; under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 31st December 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>