<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 644 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the applicants by waiving the predeposit of tax, interest, and penalty, and staying the recovery. This decision was based on the exemption provisions and the specific rental arrangement where the brothers individually rented out the property, resulting in the aggregate value falling below the threshold limit for taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:25:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 644 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the applicants by waiving the predeposit of tax, interest, and penalty, and staying the recovery. This decision was based on the exemption provisions and the specific rental arrangement where the brothers individually rented out the property, resulting in the aggregate value falling below the threshold limit for taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>