<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 639 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255440</link>
    <description>Classification of Women&#039;s Horlicks under a residuary entry was struck down because the authority failed to give reasons or examine the product&#039;s composition, milk content, statutory registration under the Milk and Milk Products Order, 1992, and the earlier classification of Horlicks as a milk product. The Court reiterated that classification must be made by applying the proper test to the essential character of the composite product, and a residuary entry can be used only when the goods do not reasonably fit a specific entry. As the clarification relied mainly on the presence of other ingredients and ignored the relevant materials, it was found arbitrary and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 639 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255440</link>
      <description>Classification of Women&#039;s Horlicks under a residuary entry was struck down because the authority failed to give reasons or examine the product&#039;s composition, milk content, statutory registration under the Milk and Milk Products Order, 1992, and the earlier classification of Horlicks as a milk product. The Court reiterated that classification must be made by applying the proper test to the essential character of the composite product, and a residuary entry can be used only when the goods do not reasonably fit a specific entry. As the clarification relied mainly on the presence of other ingredients and ignored the relevant materials, it was found arbitrary and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>