<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 638 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255439</link>
    <description>Where a first appeal is dismissed for non-compliance with a statutory pre-deposit condition, the appellate forum must first address the legality of that dismissal and the pre-deposit requirement itself. The Tribunal cannot bypass that stage and determine the assessment on merits without lawfully dealing with the pre-deposit order. The Gujarat High Court held that the Tribunal erred in deciding the merits of the appeal, quashed its order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:04:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 638 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255439</link>
      <description>Where a first appeal is dismissed for non-compliance with a statutory pre-deposit condition, the appellate forum must first address the legality of that dismissal and the pre-deposit requirement itself. The Tribunal cannot bypass that stage and determine the assessment on merits without lawfully dealing with the pre-deposit order. The Gujarat High Court held that the Tribunal erred in deciding the merits of the appeal, quashed its order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>