<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 637 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255438</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the cooperative marketing society in a tax dispute under the TNGST Act. It held that the society, acting as an intermediary, did not qualify as a &#039;dealer&#039; liable for tax under Section 2(g) of the Act. The court emphasized the society&#039;s role as a facilitator without authority to sell goods, thus exempting it from tax liability. Additionally, the court found that auction sales of agricultural produce by the society, contingent on agriculturist-members&#039; consent, did not attract sales tax. The penalty imposed under Section 12(5)(iii) of the Act was deemed unsustainable due to the society&#039;s non-dealer status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:03:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 637 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255438</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the cooperative marketing society in a tax dispute under the TNGST Act. It held that the society, acting as an intermediary, did not qualify as a &#039;dealer&#039; liable for tax under Section 2(g) of the Act. The court emphasized the society&#039;s role as a facilitator without authority to sell goods, thus exempting it from tax liability. Additionally, the court found that auction sales of agricultural produce by the society, contingent on agriculturist-members&#039; consent, did not attract sales tax. The penalty imposed under Section 12(5)(iii) of the Act was deemed unsustainable due to the society&#039;s non-dealer status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>