<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 629 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255430</link>
    <description>The court addressed the jurisdictional issue regarding the show cause notice issuance and the alleged breach of conditions under the Customs Act, 1962. It emphasized the role of the adjudicating authority in resolving objections and ruled that all issues should be considered open for comprehensive review. The judgment clarified procedural steps for responding to the notice, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present their case before the Commissioner of Customs. The court did not stay the adjudication but allowed objections to be raised, leaving the determination of addressing these objections as preliminary issues or along with other matters to the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 629 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255430</link>
      <description>The court addressed the jurisdictional issue regarding the show cause notice issuance and the alleged breach of conditions under the Customs Act, 1962. It emphasized the role of the adjudicating authority in resolving objections and ruled that all issues should be considered open for comprehensive review. The judgment clarified procedural steps for responding to the notice, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present their case before the Commissioner of Customs. The court did not stay the adjudication but allowed objections to be raised, leaving the determination of addressing these objections as preliminary issues or along with other matters to the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>