<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 626 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255427</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and directed the restoration and hearing of the appeal on its merits. The Court considered the appellant&#039;s financial constraints during the period under Court Receiver, the efforts made to revive operations, and the lack of enforcement actions by the Department. Despite the significant 16-year delay in making the pre-deposit, the Court found the reasons for seeking restoration valid, emphasizing the Company&#039;s history and revival efforts. The Court noted a similar appeal had been allowed previously without challenge, leading to the restoration of the appeal in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:43:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 626 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255427</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and directed the restoration and hearing of the appeal on its merits. The Court considered the appellant&#039;s financial constraints during the period under Court Receiver, the efforts made to revive operations, and the lack of enforcement actions by the Department. Despite the significant 16-year delay in making the pre-deposit, the Court found the reasons for seeking restoration valid, emphasizing the Company&#039;s history and revival efforts. The Court noted a similar appeal had been allowed previously without challenge, leading to the restoration of the appeal in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>