https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255425 The court upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants for evasion of duty and contravention of excise rules, finding their involvement in diverting goods and receiving extra money. The court concluded that invoking and applying Rule 173Q and 209 was legal, as the appellants were aware of the allegations. The penalties were deemed justified based on the totality of circumstances, including procedural compliance and notice adequacy. The court dismissed the appeals, stating that no substantial question of law was raised. en-us Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Sep 2017 13:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255425 The court upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants for evasion of duty and contravention of excise rules, finding their involvement in diverting goods and receiving extra money. The court concluded that invoking and applying Rule 173Q and 209 was legal, as the appellants were aware of the allegations. The penalties were deemed justified based on the totality of circumstances, including procedural compliance and notice adequacy. The court dismissed the appeals, stating that no substantial question of law was raised. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255425